How to Secure AppSec? - Application Security Tools & Best Practices | AppSec | Snyk

What is Application Security (AppSec)?

Application security, or Appsec, is a critical aspect of software development, aimed at identifying, fixing, and preventing security vulnerabilities within applications. It involves implementing a secure software development life cycle, with the ultimate objective of enhancing security practices and ensuring the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of data.

Application Security (AppSec) is a key practice. It finds, stops, and fixes security flaws in software applications from start to finish. This goes beyond just the code and includes system settings, design, databases, APIs, and the networks they run on. The main goal of AppSec is to improve security and make sure the data handled by apps stays safe, private, and available. This protects them from new online threats.

Why is application security important?

Application security is crucial because applications, especially those that are cloud native, are a gateway to servers and networks and present an ideal attack vector for malicious actors. This makes them top targets for bad actors. By building in security from the start of development, AppSec finds weaknesses before they can be used.

Since malicious actors continue to refine their methods to penetrate software, security must be an ongoing activity that’s deeply embedded in the development process.

Application security best practices help uncover vulnerabilities before attackers can use them to breach networks and data. It's also important to consider application data security to ensure that sensitive data, such as customer information, is secure.

Vulnerabilities can originate from something as simple as a configuration error or using a software component that contains a known vulnerability. The issue is widespread: according to Snyk’s 2021 State of Cloud Native Application Security report, over 56% of organizations experienced a misconfiguration or known unpatched vulnerability incident involving their cloud native applications. While not all of these vulnerabilities present a major security risk, hackers evaluate vulnerabilities to find which ones present a plausible method for penetration.

The most common issues are misconfigurations, and known, unpatched vulnerabilities

Organizations of all sizes should also be aware of the risk that misconfigurations pose, particularly those working with highly sensitive data (such as financial institutions).

How to improve AppSec Security?

To improve application security, companies need to implement a two-pronged approach:

How to Perform an Application Security Gap Analysis

In this guide we'll walk through the steps to run a Application Security Gap Analysis for asset visibility, AppSec coverage and prioritization.

Common Application Security Risks and Implications?

Modern application security is a wide and complex topic. We’ve boiled it down to five main challenges organizations commonly encounter:

Category Associated OWASP Risks / Issues
Inherited Vulnerabilities Broken Access Control, Injection, Insecure Design, Misconfiguration, Authentication Failures, Integrity Failures
Third-Party & Open-Source Risks Vulnerable & Outdated Components; OSS-specific supply chain risks
DevSecOps Approach Insecure Design, Integrity Failures, Pipeline security, early detection tools
Finding Qualified Experts Skill gaps and staff shortages impacting security effectiveness
Lack of Centralized Tooling Disjointed operations, poor visibility, inefficient coverage across teams

Inherited vulnerabilities

These are flaws originating from your own codebase—design or implementation choices.

Third-party and open source vulnerabilities

These stem from external libraries or components beyond your direct control.

The widespread use of third-party and open source libraries makes them an attractive attack vector. Transitive (or indirect) dependencies are a particular concern since developers may be using vulnerable packages without realizing it.

However, external attackers aren’t the only concern with open source dependencies. Maintainers themselves could be releasing packages with malicious code or vulnerabilities.

It’s impossible to catch all these vulnerabilities manually, so to secure open source dependencies, you need tools to make you aware of what to update (and when) and detect new vulnerabilities as they arise. In addition to scanning tools, policy enforcement can help build security into projects from the start. The OpenSSF framework, for instance, sets rules for open source software projects to comply with. If everyone used this framework, security tools might not be as necessary, but this is unlikely to happen anytime soon.

Adopting a DevSecOps approach for AppSec

In addition to security tools, it’s critical to take a shift left approach and incorporate security throughout the development process. Traditionally, scanning has taken place late in the software development life cycle. The results would be sent back to development teams for fixes, meaning security teams became a bottleneck for other business areas. The tooling itself compounded this bottleneck with additional headaches for developers: The high number of false positives meant team members lost time triaging issues.

This legacy approach worked sufficiently well for organizations using a waterfall approach to software releases, but modern software development requires a tighter, more agile integration between security and development. Finding and fixing issues earlier in development makes the process more efficient for security teams and everyone else involved.

Finding qualified experts

In addition to shifting left, the human side of security is important. Finding qualified security experts is a top priority, and security teams themselves need to improve their training, develop efficient processes, and analyze their tooling. They can then equip themselves for a more integrated security approach, where scans happen in parallel with CI/CD pipelines so developers can easily apply fixes. Organizations are finding it difficult to hire experienced cybersecurity staff, as the ratio of developers to security practitioners is around 100:1, so more organizations are leaning more on developer security with education and automation.

Lack of a centralized management tool

Security professionals are tasked with managing the risk that an organization is willing to expose itself to. The idea that it’s possible to reduce this risk to zero is, in the best case, naive and, in the worst, counterproductive. A major aspect of risk management is to assess the vulnerabilities the applications contain and to prioritize which one to address, when, and how.

Application security teams need tools to support them. They need to constantly monitor and assess the security posture of an application, and ensure that they're using the correct application security metrics to track the impact of their work. Security posture means the combination of security knowledge at all levels of the application. Based on this knowledge, security teams need to triage and build a backlog of issues to address as part of the application security process.

Finally, the security team needs to monitor and ensure that issues from the backlog are correctly and timely addressed. The best tools will be able to centralize all of this necessary reporting and present it to stakeholders in a single dashboard.

The three tiers of application security architecture

There are three tiers in the architecture of a modern application. Each tier has its own risks that need to be addressed. Here’s a look at each one, its makeup, and its potential risk profile.

1. The top tier: clients

This top tier, which may be a web front end, Internet of Things (IoT) front end, or mobile front end, is where users interact with an application. Front-end developers prioritize providing a high-performance, high-quality experience to the end user, but each type of front-end has its own threat profile, so security should not be overlooked. There are numerous ways to attack the front end, including injection and denial of service attacks.

2. The middle tier: the application

This is where data collected from users is processed. The tiered architecture itself helps protect against exploits by creating a kind of firewall between end users and data. Other tools, like fine-tuned access controls, can help secure this middle tier.

3. The bottom tier: the back end

This includes operating systems, cloud infrastructure, containers — everything used to run applications and store data. The goal of most attacks is to breach this tier, so it’s important to use secure configurations, properly configured networks, and robust data encryption to secure the back end.

A diagram of the architecture of a modern application

In the diagram below, we see the architecture of a modern application. Powering the front end is a business logic and data layer that exposes an API to the front end and runs inside the cloud (such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud).

On the left side, source code defines the client and logic, packages for your dependencies, cloud specifications (using IaC), and container files that give the configuration of containers your application will run in.

On the right side is the active production management. The cloud management consoles for production are especially valuable targets for hackers: if someone gains control of your cloud management console, they can use it to take control of machines to mine bitcoins, among other unauthorized uses.

It’s important to orchestrate security across the tiers to ensure it can be managed and operationalized. Doing so can have additional side benefits, such as the ability to detect click fraud, which can cause cloud oversubscription.

Application security architecture diagram

Application Security Best Practices

3 Key pillars of application security

There are three primary pillars of effective application security:

Here are the most important application security best practices:

Technology: review your toolset

Process: be clear

Humans: embrace their role

What are the best tools and technologies used in Application Security?

Scanning tools are central to application security because they allow developers to test applications before running them in a production environment. These tools come in many different forms, including ones that scan source code directly and others that evaluate an application by running inputs through it. Here are six common types of scanning tools:

SAST vs DAST vs SCA

Application security with Snyk

Snyk is an essential application security technology because it provides end-to-end monitoring and mitigation steps that integrate into developers' existing workflows. Its tools include:

Application Security Examples

Check out our case studies for examples of organizations that have used Snyk to improve their application security process and posture with developer-friendly workflows.

AppSec FAQs

What is the application security lifecycle?

The application security lifecycle runs parallel to the software development life cycle (SDLC). Traditional security methods involve waiting until an application is late in development — or even running in production — to secure it. Modern development practices move these practices earlier in the process, meaning that security and development teams need to incorporate security from the earliest stages of the SDLC all the way through to the runtime environment.

How do you secure an application?

Application security starts from the earliest stages of planning, where threat modeling and secure-by-design principles can ensure security is built into the application. It continues to the development and testing stages, where scanning tools can integrate into developer workflows to automate security testing. Since developers are increasingly responsible for the containers and infrastructure used to run the application, that environment also needs to be secured.

What are application security controls?

Application security controls are specific steps put in place to implement security standards. In the security hierarchy, policies are set to give organization-wide boundaries, while standards are specific rules based on those policies. Controls then put those standards into practice. For example, a company’s policy might be to only use specific encryption algorithms based on elliptic curve cryptography. Standards would then set rules for where to apply that policy in applications, and controls would then (ideally) automate their implementation.

What is application data security?

Application data security is defined as the protection of sensitive business information and customer data that is processed and stored by software applications from threats like unauthorized access, modification, or deletion, making it a key part of your overall application security strategy.

What’s the difference between application security, cloud security, and network security?

Application security focuses on safeguarding the software itself—its code, logic, interfaces, and the data it processes—from vulnerabilities and attacks. It employs practices such as secure coding, static and dynamic testing, runtime protection, and ensuring third-party dependencies are safe. In contrast, network security protects the infrastructure layer—your data in transit, perimeter defenses, network segmentation, firewalls, VPNs, and intrusion detection systems—to prevent unauthorized access to systems and data.

Cloud security spans both domains but emphasizes the protection of cloud-based environments, including infrastructure, configurations, identity and access management, and compliance. It addresses risks unique to multi-tenancy, misconfigurations, and cloud-native APIs. Application security within the cloud operates at the app level, whereas network security in the cloud may extend to securing virtual networks or enforcing secure communication between service components.

What are the core principles of secure-by-design architecture?

Secure-by-design is an engineering philosophy that embeds security as a foundational attribute of systems from the earliest stages of design, rather than retrofitting it later. It emphasizes anticipating attacks and architecting systems to constrain compromises, applying principles such as least privilege, minimizing attack surfaces, defense in depth, and continuous assurance. Complementary practices—such as simplicity (KISS), open design (avoiding security by obscurity), separation of duties, and failsafe defaults—help reinforce system robustness by reducing complexity and enhancing oversight.

What role does zero trust play in application security?

Zero Trust is a security model that operates on the principle of “never trust, always verify”—requiring continuous authentication and authorization of every user, device, and application interaction, regardless of location or network boundary. Applied to application security, Zero Trust ensures that access to applications and APIs is granted only through rigorous, context-aware controls, enforcing least-privilege policies and real-time monitoring to detect anomalous behavior.

This model also assumes breaches may occur and therefore supports architectural strategies—such as micro-segmentation, encrypted communication, IAM, and continuous behavioral analytics—that limit dwell time and lateral movement within systems, fundamentally enhancing application resilience and reducing potential attack impact.

How do you secure containers and Kubernetes workloads from an AppSec perspective?

Securing containerized applications and Kubernetes workloads requires a multi-layered strategy. First, scan container images for known vulnerabilities before deployment, enforce image signing, and integrate Infrastructure as Code (IaC) security checks early in the CI/CD pipeline. Use Kubernetes-native controls—such as admission controllers, Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), and network policies—to validate workloads, control access, and secure communication between pods and services.

Additionally, enforce best practices like using hardened host operating systems, running containers with the least required privileges, and continuously reassessing cluster configuration to avoid misconfigurations such as openly exposed namespaces or over-privileged roles.

What KPIs and metrics should CISOs track for application security maturity?

CISOs should monitor metrics that demonstrate both progress in risk reduction and the extent of AppSec integration across teams. Valuable AppSec KPIs include the number of exploitable vulnerabilities, average time to fix (MTTR), and alignment with compliance frameworks—all of which Snyk’s platform can help track and visualize. Equally important are metrics reflecting team engagement and coverage—such as percentage of projects with integrated SAST/DAST, vulnerability remediation rates, and developer adoption of AppSec tools.

Unlock DevSecOps with Snyk

Overcome application complexities and AI hallucinations while fostering collaboration between dev and sec teams with insights from Snyk and Accenture.